# Nested Properties

**URL:** https://pug.phocassoftware.com/t/nested-properties/2656
**Category:** Product Ideas
**Created:** [February 26, 2024, 9:23pm UTC](https://pug.phocassoftware.com/t/nested-properties/2656 "2024-02-26T21:23:00Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JonKemp](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/pug.phocassoftware.com/jonkemp/32/334_2.png) [@JonKemp](https://pug.phocassoftware.com/u/JonKemp)
#### Post date: [April 2, 2024, 9:48am UTC](https://pug.phocassoftware.com/t/nested-properties/2656/2 "2024-04-02T09:48:45Z")

</div>

Hi @scottmunroe ,

This unfortunaltey has been a long standing gripe of mine. The only means of mitigation will be to create a deddicated dimension, My DB has swollen in size due to this limiting factor (I have many example of where the “Code” is something I need to remove). Here is the original post I made back in 2019:

> [@Nesting mode - removal of code](https://pug.phocassoftware.com/t/nesting-mode-removal-of-code/1065/5):
>
> What I don’t understand is that in typical queries, the Code property can be excluded. It’s only when you enter Nested Grid that the code property becomes grayed out. I get that the code is required as a key in order to perform the joins tying the data sets together, but why is that information necessary to be displayed? This is starting to cause issues with regards to being able to send reporting out via automation to outside clients. On one hand, I can subscribe to the report, and forward i…

Reagrds,

Jon

---

_[View the full topic](https://pug.phocassoftware.com/t/nested-properties/2656)._
